|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,242 Likes: 4
8 point
|
|
8 point
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,242 Likes: 4 |
Hey all. A few years ago I promised that we would share the results of the deer research that we did that was funded by ADCNR. Attached below are two of the publications that came out of this research. Sorry it took so long to post these. Happy reading. Publication 1Publication 2
*************** Steve Ditchkoff College of Forestry, Wildlife and Environment Auburn University ***************
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 70
spike
|
|
spike
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 70 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 13,869 Likes: 284
Booner
|
|
Booner
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 13,869 Likes: 284 |
Summary based on what I was able to skim through in 5 min at lunch, one study shows that roughly 18-20% of bucks in the study succumbed to a mortality cause other than a bullet or broadhead with doe natural mortality be nominal compared to bucks . The other study showed that deer dont like human pressure. With that said, it showed that does are more tolerant of it than bucks, and mature bucks especially, move more when it is dark and/or when humans are not present.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,031 Likes: 10
8 Point
|
|
8 Point
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,031 Likes: 10 |
Summary based on what I was able to skim through in 5 min at lunch, one study shows that roughly 18-20% of bucks in the study succumbed to a mortality cause other than a bullet or broadhead with doe natural mortality be nominal compared to bucks . The other study showed that deer dont like human pressure. With that said, it showed that does are more tolerant of it than bucks, and mature bucks especially, move more when it is dark and/or when humans are not present. Pretty good summary, but add- just hunt on Wednesdays and Thursdays.
Its not the will to win but the will to prepare to win!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 555 Likes: 4
4 point
|
|
4 point
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 555 Likes: 4 |
Summary based on what I was able to skim through in 5 min at lunch, one study shows that roughly 18-20% of bucks in the study succumbed to a mortality cause other than a bullet or broadhead with doe natural mortality be nominal compared to bucks . The other study showed that deer dont like human pressure. With that said, it showed that does are more tolerant of it than bucks, and mature bucks especially, move more when it is dark and/or when humans are not present. Pretty good summary, but add- just hunt on Wednesdays and Thursdays. I look forward to reading the studies later when I have more time. I noticed years ago that visible deer movement went way down Friday - Monday and then picked back up Tuesday - Thursday. All during the week the woods were quite and peaceful and then come Friday when all the trucks and atv’s piled in, every critter within ear shot knew danger just showed up.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 26,766 Likes: 174
Freak of Nature
|
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 26,766 Likes: 174 |
Summary based on what I was able to skim through in 5 min at lunch, one study shows that roughly 18-20% of bucks in the study succumbed to a mortality cause other than a bullet or broadhead with doe natural mortality be nominal compared to bucks . The other study showed that deer dont like human pressure. With that said, it showed that does are more tolerant of it than bucks, and mature bucks especially, move more when it is dark and/or when humans are not present. That explains some of the the loss of those 2.5 -3.5 yr old bucks Would those loses be from breeding stress or multiple reasons
Last edited by cartervj; 05/17/24 05:30 AM.
“Socialism only works in two places: Heaven where they don't need it and hell where they already have it.” ― Ronald Reagan
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 19,268 Likes: 28
Old Mossy Horns
|
|
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 19,268 Likes: 28 |
welllllllll ,,, im gonna just shack my head and walk off .
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 6,041
12 point
|
|
12 point
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 6,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,242 Likes: 4
8 point
|
|
8 point
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,242 Likes: 4 |
Summary based on what I was able to skim through in 5 min at lunch, one study shows that roughly 18-20% of bucks in the study succumbed to a mortality cause other than a bullet or broadhead with doe natural mortality be nominal compared to bucks . The other study showed that deer dont like human pressure. With that said, it showed that does are more tolerant of it than bucks, and mature bucks especially, move more when it is dark and/or when humans are not present. That explains some of the the loss of those 2.5 -3.5 yr old bucks Would those loses be from breeding stress or multiple reasons Mostly breeding stress. Below is an article we published from some work in Oklahoma on rut-related stress. Article
*************** Steve Ditchkoff College of Forestry, Wildlife and Environment Auburn University ***************
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 20,369 Likes: 35
Freak of Nature
|
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 20,369 Likes: 35 |
Summary based on what I was able to skim through in 5 min at lunch, one study shows that roughly 18-20% of bucks in the study succumbed to a mortality cause other than a bullet or broadhead with doe natural mortality be nominal compared to bucks . The other study showed that deer dont like human pressure. With that said, it showed that does are more tolerant of it than bucks, and mature bucks especially, move more when it is dark and/or when humans are not present. That explains some of the the loss of those 2.5 -3.5 yr old bucks Would those loses be from breeding stress or multiple reasons Mostly breeding stress. Below is an article we published from some work in Oklahoma on rut-related stress. ArticleGood stuff. Thanks for posting
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 28,045 Likes: 92
Freak of Nature
|
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 28,045 Likes: 92 |
Chat GPT Summary of shorter paper:
Adult white‐tailed deer survival in hunted populations on public and private lands
Study Area Summary Locations
The study was conducted in four areas of Alabama, USA:
Barbour Wildlife Management Area (WMA): 114 km² Oakmulgee WMA: 180 km² Marengo: 31 km² (combination of privately owned and leased land) Pickens: 49 km² (leased by a private timber company to hunting clubs)
Terrain and Habitat
Barbour WMA and Marengo: Located in the northern portion of Alabama's lower coastal plain with gently rolling terrain. Oakmulgee WMA and Pickens: Located in the southern foothills of the Appalachian Mountains, characterized by rugged terrain with steep to moderate slopes. Public-use Areas: Dominated by mixed pine-hardwood stands managed on a 3-5 year prescribed burn rotation. Private-land Areas: Managed primarily for timber production, with varying stages of loblolly and shortleaf pine regeneration and hardwoods restricted to streamside zones.
Climate
Precipitation: Mean annual precipitation was 147 cm. Temperature: Winter temperatures ranged from -1 to 20°C, and summer temperatures ranged from 18 to 34°C.
Deer Hunting Regulations
Hunting Season: Each area had a 109-day hunting season with dates varying to align with local deer breeding times: Oakmulgee WMA and Pickens: 15 October – 31 January Barbour WMA and Marengo: 25 October – 10 February Harvest Limits: Statewide regulations allowed one antlerless and one antlered deer per hunter per day, with a maximum of three antlered deer per season. Antler Point Restriction (APR): Applied variably across areas: On private properties, one of the antlered deer had to have ≥4 antler points on one side. Self-imposed restrictions on private lands required all antlered deer to be at least 3.5 years old. Barbour WMA required each harvested antlered deer to have ≥3 antler points on one side. In 2015-2016, Oakmulgee WMA was split into two management zones with different antler point restrictions.
Hunting Effort
Public Lands: Higher hunting effort was observed, especially on Saturdays with an average of 0.72 hunters/km²/day. Private Lands: Lower hunting effort with an average of 0.013 hunter hours/ha/day.
Methods Deer Capture and Monitoring
Capture Period: October 2013 to March 2014, and May-September of 2014 and 2015. Techniques: Deer were immobilized and fitted with VHF radiocollars and ear tags. Age was estimated using tooth replacement and wear, and live body characteristics. Monitoring Period: 15 February 2014 to 14 February 2016. Public Outreach: Hunters were informed to treat collared deer the same as uncollared ones regarding harvest decisions.
Data Analysis
Survival and Mortality Rates: Estimated using Program MARK with a known fate model. Seasons Defined: Post-breeding (15 Feb–14 Jun), parturition (15 Jun–14 Oct), and breeding (15 Oct–14 Feb). Age Classes: Deer were grouped into <3.5 years (immature) and ≥3.5 years (mature) for survival estimates. Modeling: Two sets of models were developed to assess survival and probability of hunter harvest, considering factors like sex, age, and landownership.
Results
Sample Size: Monitored 79 radio-collared deer (33 males, 46 females), resulting in 141 deer-years. Mortalities: 30 documented mortalities (77% harvest-related, 17% natural, 6% unknown). Key Findings: Mortality was primarily driven by hunter harvest. Mature males had significantly higher mortality rates than immature males. No significant variation in survival between public and private lands. Landownership did not significantly affect survival rates.
Discussion
Primary Driver: Hunter harvest was the main factor affecting deer survival. Comparison with Other Studies: Contrary to some studies, no significant differences in survival rates between public and private lands were found, likely due to self-imposed restrictions on private lands and state-mandated regulations on public lands. Management Implications: Findings highlight the importance of hunter regulations and selective harvest practices in managing deer populations.
|
|
|
|
|