|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 members (beano1, Ron A., Irishguy, kyles, outdoorguy88, jacannon, MoeBuck, StateLine, MikeP, 000buck, Fbw93, cartervj, Narrow Gap, Skullworks, wareagle22, Obsession, PikeRoadHunter, AUjerbear, Josh3, MCW, BPI, Young20, 3Gs, 7mmSTW, mopar, Bama-66, fur_n_feathers, mjs14, janiemae, Fishminer91, gobblebox, gregnbc, 6 invisible),
749
guests, and
0
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,417 Likes: 1
10 point
|
|
10 point
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,417 Likes: 1 |
As title states what do you use and why. I am in the market for a new scope and with all the different magnifications I didn't know which was the best. Longest shots will be 500 yards.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,851
10 point
|
|
10 point
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,851 |
Depends on your preference and how far. You can shoot a 10x scope at 1000 yards pretty easy. That being said most of my regular scopes go up to 10x. My long range rigs are a 22x and 36x.
Only accurate rifles are interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,983
12 point
|
|
12 point
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,983 |
As my eyes get worse a 3x9 is only good in the woods for me less than 100yds...thinking hard about a24x or bigger and 50mm
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 12,564 Likes: 8
Doesn’t Know His Code
|
|
Doesn’t Know His Code
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 12,564 Likes: 8 |
IMO, the best all around power range for a scope would be 3-12 or 4-16.
IKNOWMYPHUCKINGCODEDAMMITYOUDICKHEAD!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670
Leupold Pro Staff
|
|
Leupold Pro Staff
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670 |
Is 500 yards common for you,or is under 100 a lot more likely?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,746 Likes: 26
8 point
|
|
8 point
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,746 Likes: 26 |
Personally I'd get an 18x
Two roads diverged in the woods and I took the one with deep ruts,hills and mud.It may be bumpy but WHAT A RIDE!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,908 Likes: 2
14 point
|
|
14 point
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,908 Likes: 2 |
Most of my guns for just general hunting have something in the 2-10x or 3-12 flavor. As long as the reticle isn't real heavy 500 yards is no problem for 10x. The military standard for probably 30 years was just 10x. It isn't "tacticool" and your buddies won't think you are a badarse though.
If your rifle will spend it's hunting career poked out a shooting house window I would do something in the 4-14x range.
If you hunt in the woods at all, I'd do 3-9, 2-10x, maybe 2-8 on a compact rifle... and try and read some reviews by Optic's guys and become as knowledgeable as possible in things like field of view, contrast, etc. Those can make/break a scope and what set the high end stuff apart so pay attention to the specs. Disregard reviews that go something like "I mounted this on my 30-30 and shot a hub cap at 200 yards first try. This is the clearest scope I ever looked through. I pointed it at the sun and I couldn't see out of my right eye for 2 days. Way better than my cousin's Tasco. Can't wait to shoot my first doe in the arse with it. War Eagle."
No government employees were harmed in the making of this mess.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,851
10 point
|
|
10 point
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,851 |
Can't wait to shoot my first doe in the arse with it. War Eagle."

Only accurate rifles are interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 498
4 point
|
|
4 point
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 498 |
Though 3-9 is the most common for deer rifles, I really like my Zeiss 3-12x50. The 12 power can really come in handy at longer ranges.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 39,938 Likes: 130
Freak of Nature
|
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 39,938 Likes: 130 |
Nothing with a power range with the upper end over 12X.
"Why do you ask"?
Too many people spend money they don't have , on things they don't need, to impress people they don't know.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 821
6 point
|
|
6 point
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 821 |
I've always used a 3x9. I own a couple of higher power and use them for target but the higher power scopes aren't as good at light gathering. There might be some on the market but in my experience the higher the power the less clarity at dark when it counts. Thats the reason I use a high power set of binoculars
Last edited by Stikman; 03/31/16 01:24 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,410
8 point
|
|
8 point
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,410 |
I have found that a 3.5-10 or 2.5-10 is perfect for me. Low enough to pick out tree limbs that may deflect a shot and 10x is enough to make a 3-400 yard shot. I can make much longer shots but for practical hunting situations, I'm just not gonna try a 300+ yard shot off my knee or tree limb.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,417 Likes: 1
10 point
|
|
10 point
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,417 Likes: 1 |
Is 500 yards common for you,or is under 100 a lot more likely? I can shoot up to 1000 yards but choose not too. 500 is bout my max.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,417 Likes: 1
10 point
|
|
10 point
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,417 Likes: 1 |
I currently have a 3.5x10-50 monarch on my deer rifle. I have another rifle and want to equip with a quality scope but was just curious if I should go with something else. Think my best bet is to buy another monarch in a similar power
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670
Leupold Pro Staff
|
|
Leupold Pro Staff
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670 |
Is 500 yards common for you,or is under 100 a lot more likely? I can shoot up to 1000 yards but choose not too. 500 is bout my max. That's not what I asked. I asked the distance of the majority of your shots,not how far you might possibly shoot. I would buy a scope maximized for the most common distance.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,417 Likes: 1
10 point
|
|
10 point
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,417 Likes: 1 |
Is 500 yards common for you,or is under 100 a lot more likely? I can shoot up to 1000 yards but choose not too. 500 is bout my max. That's not what I asked. I asked the distance of the majority of your shots,not how far you might possibly shoot. I would buy a scope maximized for the most common distance. Ok. I killed three deer last year. One at 4 yards one at 35 and one at 405. When the deer I want to shoot steps out I kill it.
Last edited by icducks; 03/31/16 04:06 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 16,156
Old Mossy Horns
|
|
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 16,156 |
i would say something in the 12-15x on the top end. i use a 3-12 zeiss for my general hunting. i use a 5.5-22 for my long-range stuff...
"Just remember a gobbler has to win every time, you only have to win once" BC
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,000
12 point
|
|
12 point
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,000 |
4x16x50 is a good choice. Vortex Viper PST is a really good midrange scope. With 4 power you can hunt in woods. With 16x power you can kill deer out to 500 yards. Main thing you need is knowledge. If you dont have a dial up turret scope, rangefinder,ballistics cart, and know the BC of your bullet and guns exact MV then 500 will not happen. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670
Leupold Pro Staff
|
|
Leupold Pro Staff
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670 |
Is 500 yards common for you,or is under 100 a lot more likely? I can shoot up to 1000 yards but choose not too. 500 is bout my max. That's not what I asked. I asked the distance of the majority of your shots,not how far you might possibly shoot. I would buy a scope maximized for the most common distance. Ok. I killed three deer last year. One at 4 yards one at 35 and one at 405. When the deer I want to shoot steps out I kill it. Then if it were me.I would be looking at something in the 4-12 range with a SF.The Bushnell 6500 2.5-16 comes to mind also.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,908 Likes: 2
14 point
|
|
14 point
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,908 Likes: 2 |
93 Confirmed, 360 Unconfirmed with an 8x or 10x including a 2500 meter kill with this 10x Unertl: Hubble Telescope NOT NEEDED.
Last edited by Goatkiller; 04/01/16 04:54 AM.
No government employees were harmed in the making of this mess.
|
|
|
|
|