|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 registered members (Longtine, Skillet, hue, doublefistful, Chaser1, HHSyelper, having fun now, eeua90, aubigmac, Bruno, Whiskey9, Ryano, BPI, Lil_Fella, 7PTSPREAD, hallb, blade, Exhoosier, Mike59, SouthBamaSlayer, Bandit635, JAT, AU338MAG, cdaddy14, ronfromramer, RCHRR, geeb1, BCLC, Doeslayer44, SilverBullet, kaferhaus, weatherby, Stu, bass1090, gobblebox, Bowfish, hoggin, Gobble4me757, frosty, 000buck, Sself161, CatfishJunkie, Shmoe, IDOT, Solothurn, pickenstj, aucountry, BAR1225, Tree Dweller, beano1, Luvbowhuntn, stl32, hamma, rickyh_2, donia, Drycreek, rutwad, zgobbler5, Mulcher, South Ala Hunter, lectrode, Quack Quack Bang, therealhojo, Mdees, Dead down wind, BradB, HBWALKER14, Backwards cowboy, BCD, CNC, top cat, DGAMBLER, buzzard, Remington270, woodduck, wareagul, Justice, Joe4majors, Moose24, Paint Rock 00, Narrow Gap, Cactus_buck, JustHunt, Tailwalk7, WPZJR, jb20, deer3616, jhardy, GoldenEagle, dquick1, Shaneomac2, auburn17, Josh77, BhamFred, Beak_Buster, Powers, CeeHawk37, !shiloh!, 300gr, BC, MCW, deadeye48, CrappieMan, NVM1031, Bustinbeards, Driveby, Cedar, TheVern, cchoque93, booner, doc bar, crenshawco, 3bailey3, Rockstar007, FreeStateHunter, BamaBoHunter, Jdkprp70, CAL, Takeum, Hunting-231, low wall, Obsession, Blessed, AJones, biglmbass, fishhead, 3 invisible),
507
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Good debate question: Antlerless buck still a buck, or "antlerless"
[Re: BDhunts]
#59593
12/16/10 08:21 AM
12/16/10 08:21 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,997
Warrior River Country
49er
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,997
Warrior River Country
|
So to IL a two inch spike is antlerless. There are several states where an antlerless deer is defined as a deer with antlers less than 3 inches long. When the CAB copied other states in their attempts to be popular, they forgot about that one.
|
|
|
Re: Good debate question: Antlerless buck still a buck, or "antlerless"
[Re: Clem]
#59882
12/16/10 06:48 PM
12/16/10 06:48 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,689
Falkville
MTeague
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,689
Falkville
|
if it has no antlers it is considered antlerless whether it has balls or not. If it has antlers it is a buck. Their should be no gray area!!!!!
I had much rather be tried by twelve than carried to my grave by six!!!!
|
|
|
Re: Good debate question: Antlerless buck still a buck, or "antlerless"
[Re: MTeague]
#59943
12/16/10 08:46 PM
12/16/10 08:46 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,997
Warrior River Country
49er
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,997
Warrior River Country
|
Not true. If a doe has antlers it is not a buck, and would not fall within the definition of "antlered" in the rule. The gray area lies in deciding whether some of the remaining antler is visible above the natural hairline. You might see it one way and the game warden might see it another. To avoid this gray area, put it on your little qdm sheet anyhow. Then, if you don't agree with liberal appointees writing whatever rules they want to regardless of what the law says, destroy the record when you get the deer home or deliver it to a processor: ... (5) Any person who harvests an antlered buck or turkey, shall have in their
possession the harvest record of that antlered buck or turkey until it is
processed and stored in a cooler or freezer at one’s residence or
delivered to a commercial processing plant.
|
|
|
|
