|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119 registered members (Safetyman, Snuffy, firemandc, Turberville, ALDawg, sidehitter, JHL, 270wsm, RareBreed, jwalker77, DPD, baitstop, mjs14, Wapiti55, low wall, JohnG, capehorn24, brushwhacker, Turkeyhunter12, headshot, CrappieMan, courseup, UARandy3, UncleHuck, Atoler, CNC, Jstocks, square, Peach, Red Fox, globe, rutwad, Dean, mcninja, Bowfish, GMR, AU coonhunter, bug54, gobblebox, Crawfish, sbo1971, Bushmaster, Narrow Gap, deerman24, Brian_C, Skillet, akbejeepin, Whild_Bill, jawbone, Chiller, ImThere, thayerp81, Frankie, gatorbait154, Letshunt, Sasquatch Lives, sj22, BCLC, scrape, Beulahboy, Jtide, Tator1, twaldrop4, TurkeyJoe, beeline08, brianr, msims767, cartervj, Mike32, Turkeyneck78, Skullworks, dagwood, loprofile, BamaBoHunter, GATA87, outdoorguy88, MR3391, snakebit, RockFarmer, GUT_SHOT, wk2hnt, Dempsey, OutdoorsAL, mw2015, mossyback, weatherby, 4Him146, !shiloh!, fillmore, Jweeks, brett.smith, doublefistful, Jmoore77, Uokman2014, donia, Cjunkin, Canterberry, Bustinbeards, canine933, Bulls eye, trlrdrdave, CKyleC, El_Matador, joeml18, 15 invisible),
733
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Long range/precision scopes question
[Re: hallb]
#3885093
03/26/23 08:13 PM
03/26/23 08:13 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 10,384
northport
deadeye48
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 10,384
northport
|
If you reload and get consistent speeds the CDS system works great
Last edited by deadeye48; 03/26/23 08:14 PM.
When I need expert advice I tend to talk to myself
The older I get the better I used to be
|
|
|
Re: Long range/precision scopes question
[Re: hallb]
#3885313
03/27/23 09:27 AM
03/27/23 09:27 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,825
Jasper
buckhunter2
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,825
Jasper
|
Dialing is most always the preferred method b/c it allows for a more precise wind hold.
The Christmas tree style reticle is needed when there isn’t time to dial for all targets. Often times in PRS you have to engage multiple targets at multiple distances from several different positions in 90-seconds so there isn’t time to dial for each target.
Also a standard duplex would be useless for engaging moving targets b/c the lead would simply be a guess.
There are no cons to having tactical turrets and a tactical reticle. There’s a lot of cons to having only one or the other.
Several manufacturers do make what you are referencing for hunting. Swaro BRH reticle is very useful for hunting but would be totally useless for PRS comps.
You're only as good as your worst shot-
|
|
|
Re: Long range/precision scopes question
[Re: buckhunter2]
#3885373
03/27/23 12:04 PM
03/27/23 12:04 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 10,617
Santa Rosa/Conecuh
hallb
OP
Booner
|
OP
Booner
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 10,617
Santa Rosa/Conecuh
|
Dialing is most always the preferred method b/c it allows for a more precise wind hold.
The Christmas tree style reticle is needed when there isn’t time to dial for all targets. Often times in PRS you have to engage multiple targets at multiple distances from several different positions in 90-seconds so there isn’t time to dial for each target.
Also a standard duplex would be useless for engaging moving targets b/c the lead would simply be a guess.
There are no cons to having tactical turrets and a tactical reticle. There’s a lot of cons to having only one or the other.
Several manufacturers do make what you are referencing for hunting. Swaro BRH reticle is very useful for hunting but would be totally useless for PRS comps.
Makes sense, wasn't thinking about the competition guys. I like the BRH reticle, but I wish it just had MOA marks.
|
|
|
Re: Long range/precision scopes question
[Re: hallb]
#3885504
03/27/23 03:51 PM
03/27/23 03:51 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,580
Tuscaloosa Co.
N2TRKYS
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,580
Tuscaloosa Co.
|
Dialing is most always the preferred method b/c it allows for a more precise wind hold.
The Christmas tree style reticle is needed when there isn’t time to dial for all targets. Often times in PRS you have to engage multiple targets at multiple distances from several different positions in 90-seconds so there isn’t time to dial for each target.
Also a standard duplex would be useless for engaging moving targets b/c the lead would simply be a guess.
There are no cons to having tactical turrets and a tactical reticle. There’s a lot of cons to having only one or the other.
Several manufacturers do make what you are referencing for hunting. Swaro BRH reticle is very useful for hunting but would be totally useless for PRS comps.
Makes sense, wasn't thinking about the competition guys. I like the BRH reticle, but I wish it just had MOA marks. SWFA offers mil and moa reticles.
83% of all statistics are made up.
|
|
|
|
(Custom).JPG)
