</a JR Holmes Oil Company </a Shark Guard Southeast Woods and Whitetail Mayer Insurance Services LLC
Aldeer Classifieds
Trade or sell
by buzzbait. 04/18/24 05:07 PM
95 Ford F250 HD
by Rudy. 04/18/24 02:15 PM
WTB RugerMK IV 22/45 tactical
by JLavender. 04/17/24 08:08 PM
2011 Toyota RAV4
by jsubrett6. 04/16/24 10:00 PM
Remington 700 SPS Buckmasters Edition
by Mbrock. 04/16/24 09:30 PM
Serious Deer Talk
Windy.com
by Bowhunter2011. 04/18/24 09:40 PM
Tdogs mount
by DGAMBLER. 04/18/24 08:37 PM
First cwd transmission to human?
by donia. 04/18/24 06:53 AM
seems like
by donia. 04/17/24 04:01 PM
Southern Illinois Hunting
by jdhunter2011. 04/17/24 11:42 AM
April
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Land, Leases, Hunting Clubs
Help against Timber Company
by winlamberth. 04/17/24 11:31 PM
South Side Hunting Club (Baldwin County)
by Stickslinger91. 04/15/24 10:38 AM
Lease Prices in Lamar Co.
by Luxfisher. 04/12/24 05:38 PM
Kansas Muzzleloader/Bow
by Letshunt. 04/11/24 03:15 PM
G&E Hunting Club Questions
by booner. 04/11/24 01:11 PM
Who's Online Now
141 registered members (BAR1225, Turkeyneck78, cullmanbamafan, blade, Cahabariverrat, Cody Fowler, Jdkprp70, RayDog, eskimo270, TDog93, BCLC, CatfishJunkie, Sus scrofa Reduction Specialist, redfish1827, BearBranch, Booner Hunter, quailman, JD_Bowhunter1976, Turkey_neck, Moose24, Bustinbeards, Ol’Tom, rickyh_2, hallb, Butchman205, outdoorguy88, Whild_Bill, RAmerica, top cat, LongBeards29, akbejeepin, DoubleShoalsJR, FreeStateHunter, turfarmer, TwoRs, Big Bore, Bowhunter2011, AU338MAG, Gobble4me757, Mbrock, 4Tigers, Dog, CNC, treemydog, Catbird, Andalusia, Bigbuckdown1994, Joe4majors, Bronco 74, timberwolfe, coonhunterrn, thayerp81, taggedout, Shane99, MAG, Booger, BCD, JustHunt, mossyback, AL18, desertdog, cartervj, jbatey1, Claims Rep., AJones, roosterbob, turkey247, jake44, just_an_illusion, Narrow Gap, fourfive45, Skillet, MikeP, tidenate, foldemup, sw1002, phinfan, Fullthrottle, Bows4evr, AlabamaPhi, woodduck, Floorman1, KnightRyder, Reload410, Pwyse, beRAD, Dubie, buzzard, BobK, DoeMaster, Young20, Semo, Camden86, blumsden, Wildboar14, Letshunt, Cynical, cbs, DThrash, gobbler, Dave_H, IDOT, Ryano, JRigs10, Blake82, Turkey, Forrestgump1, jellyhead11, mzzy, canvasback, chevydude2015, laidback, NonTypical, 2walnuts, Remington270, DoeNut, Hammertime7v2, Lockwood, Elba thermal, Gardener, Jotjackson, El_Matador, DGAMBLER, Jay512, HawkPilot, CrappieMan, Woodsy, BBD23, SuperSpike, wareagul, Cuz-Pat, 10 invisible), 723 guests, and 0 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Stanford and Boise lost #218542
11/12/11 10:23 PM
11/12/11 10:23 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 63,671
Luverne, AL
Skinny Offline OP
GUVNER
Skinny  Offline OP
GUVNER
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 63,671
Luverne, AL
Mind you that both of them lost to mediocre teams from really weak conferences. Watch how the polls play this. wink


Never Trust Government

"You can be broke but you cant be poor." Ruthie-May Webster
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skinny] #218548
11/12/11 10:26 PM
11/12/11 10:26 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 32,451
North Alabama
YEKRUT Offline
Turkey Nut
YEKRUT  Offline
Turkey Nut
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 32,451
North Alabama
What you smokin Skinny! Stanford game is in the 3rd right now. Loks like they are going to lose, but they haven't yet.


Some men are mere hunters; others are turkey hunters. —Archibald Rutledge—
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skinny] #218560
11/12/11 10:38 PM
11/12/11 10:38 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,749
Home
S
Shuter II Offline
10 point
Shuter II  Offline
10 point
S
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,749
Home
Dayum! That must be some good chit!

Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skinny] #218583
11/12/11 11:22 PM
11/12/11 11:22 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 25,947
Prattville, Alabama
Skullworks Offline
Freak of Nature
Skullworks  Offline
Freak of Nature
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 25,947
Prattville, Alabama
Looking like Skinny is Nostradamus. smile


"I'm not near as critical about how big they are as I once was. Smiles are more important now! We will grow more deer."
Jimmy G.
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skinny] #218584
11/12/11 11:24 PM
11/12/11 11:24 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 32,451
North Alabama
YEKRUT Offline
Turkey Nut
YEKRUT  Offline
Turkey Nut
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 32,451
North Alabama
Oregon is putting a skull screwing on them like GA did Auburn today.


Some men are mere hunters; others are turkey hunters. —Archibald Rutledge—
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skinny] #218586
11/12/11 11:25 PM
11/12/11 11:25 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 32,451
North Alabama
YEKRUT Offline
Turkey Nut
YEKRUT  Offline
Turkey Nut
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 32,451
North Alabama
Ok this is getting UGLY! I love it.


Some men are mere hunters; others are turkey hunters. —Archibald Rutledge—
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skinny] #218587
11/12/11 11:25 PM
11/12/11 11:25 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 23,150
All Over
Dustin Offline
Freak of Nature
Dustin  Offline
Freak of Nature
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 23,150
All Over
Stanford folded like a chinese wal mart lawn chair under Bronco's girlfriend. They'll drop like a rock.

Boise was playing make believe.


Don't let life get in the way of living
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skinny] #218592
11/12/11 11:30 PM
11/12/11 11:30 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 32,451
North Alabama
YEKRUT Offline
Turkey Nut
YEKRUT  Offline
Turkey Nut
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 32,451
North Alabama
what dustin said!


Some men are mere hunters; others are turkey hunters. —Archibald Rutledge—
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: YEKRUT] #218597
11/12/11 11:40 PM
11/12/11 11:40 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,924
Decatur
chevyman Offline
12 point
chevyman  Offline
12 point
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,924
Decatur
yep


Wisdom doesn't always come with age.
Sometimes age shows up all by itself.
Roll Tide
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skinny] #218735
11/13/11 12:42 PM
11/13/11 12:42 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,828
West Tennessee
BamaProud Offline
Booner
BamaProud  Offline
Booner
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,828
West Tennessee
Now the question is: Is Oklahoma state really the 2nd best team in the Nation?


Save the Little ones for the little ones
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: BamaProud] #218737
11/13/11 12:47 PM
11/13/11 12:47 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 4,215
auburn
007 Offline
10 point
007  Offline
10 point
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 4,215
auburn
Originally Posted By: BamaProud
Now the question is: Is Oklahoma state really the 2nd best team in the Nation?

The only way that will ever be answered is with a playoff. Otherwise the spinners will spin it the way they want.


If you do the things you need to do when you need to do them then someday you can do the things you want to do when you want to do them.
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skinny] #218755
11/13/11 01:26 PM
11/13/11 01:26 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 25,947
Prattville, Alabama
Skullworks Offline
Freak of Nature
Skullworks  Offline
Freak of Nature
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 25,947
Prattville, Alabama
If everyone stays the same and Oklahoma beats Okie State I figure Oklahoma will jump to #2. Not many people want to see a Bama/LSU or LSU/Oregon rematch.


"I'm not near as critical about how big they are as I once was. Smiles are more important now! We will grow more deer."
Jimmy G.
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: 007] #218758
11/13/11 01:28 PM
11/13/11 01:28 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 63,671
Luverne, AL
Skinny Offline OP
GUVNER
Skinny  Offline OP
GUVNER
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 63,671
Luverne, AL
Originally Posted By: 007
Originally Posted By: BamaProud
Now the question is: Is Oklahoma state really the 2nd best team in the Nation?

The only way that will ever be answered is with a playoff. Otherwise the spinners will spin it the way they want.


Auburn did it last year with all offense and mediocre defense. I dont see why OkSt couldn't do the same thing.


Never Trust Government

"You can be broke but you cant be poor." Ruthie-May Webster
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skinny] #218762
11/13/11 01:33 PM
11/13/11 01:33 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,828
West Tennessee
BamaProud Offline
Booner
BamaProud  Offline
Booner
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,828
West Tennessee
Yes mediocre, with one really really good defensive player.

Oklahoma State is my Big 12 team...but I don't think they have anything close to what Auburn had last year.


Save the Little ones for the little ones
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: BamaProud] #218815
11/13/11 04:22 PM
11/13/11 04:22 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,451
Bama
B
Bulls eye Offline
10 point
Bulls eye  Offline
10 point
B
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,451
Bama
When OK beats Ok State it will really get interesting....

Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skullworks] #218834
11/13/11 05:00 PM
11/13/11 05:00 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,924
Decatur
chevyman Offline
12 point
chevyman  Offline
12 point
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,924
Decatur
Do you really think they would go to number 2 after losing to a miserable Texas Tech team?Not being smart, just a sincere question.


Wisdom doesn't always come with age.
Sometimes age shows up all by itself.
Roll Tide
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: chevyman] #218863
11/13/11 06:20 PM
11/13/11 06:20 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 25,947
Prattville, Alabama
Skullworks Offline
Freak of Nature
Skullworks  Offline
Freak of Nature
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 25,947
Prattville, Alabama
Originally Posted By: chevyman
Do you really think they would go to number 2 after losing to a miserable Texas Tech team?Not being smart, just a sincere question.


I think they will want to find a way to keep Alabama and LSU from having a rematch. It will be interesting to see ow it plays out.

All I know is if LSU gets to play for the BCSNC vs anyone but Alabama they better win the thing! smile

Last edited by Skullworks; 11/13/11 06:20 PM.

"I'm not near as critical about how big they are as I once was. Smiles are more important now! We will grow more deer."
Jimmy G.
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: chevyman] #218884
11/13/11 06:58 PM
11/13/11 06:58 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 25,110
Guntersville, AL
IDOT Online happy
I am Cornholio
IDOT  Online Happy
I am Cornholio
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 25,110
Guntersville, AL
Originally Posted By: chevyman
Do you really think they would go to number 2 after losing to a miserable Texas Tech team?Not being smart, just a sincere question.


It's all about WHEN you lose. If the State gets beat by the Sooners, the Sooners will jump to #2 and Bammer will be out. Alabama, really needs LSU to lose to Arkansas to get back in the dance.


Originally Posted by Patricia Heaton
If you’re a common sense person, you probably don’t feel you have a home in this world right now. If you’re a Christian, you know you were never meant to.


Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skinny] #218937
11/13/11 08:21 PM
11/13/11 08:21 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 10,645
Past Ol’ man Finley’s plac...
Southwood7 Offline
Booner
Southwood7  Offline
Booner
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 10,645
Past Ol’ man Finley’s plac...
I think Bama's best chance to get in the NC game is for LSU to win out. If/when Oklahoma beats Oklahoma state, the voters will look at the losses. Alabama lost to the #1 team in the nation and Bama gets in...I hope wink



The Spirit of God has made me; the breath of the Almighty gives me life.
Job 33:4
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Southwood7] #218958
11/13/11 08:42 PM
11/13/11 08:42 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,924
Decatur
chevyman Offline
12 point
chevyman  Offline
12 point
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,924
Decatur
Thats the way I see it also.


Wisdom doesn't always come with age.
Sometimes age shows up all by itself.
Roll Tide
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Southwood7] #219047
11/13/11 09:53 PM
11/13/11 09:53 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,456
Dallas Co
Little Foot Offline
12 point
Little Foot  Offline
12 point
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,456
Dallas Co
Originally Posted By: Southwood7
I think Bama's best chance to get in the NC game is for LSU to win out. If/when Oklahoma beats Oklahoma state, the voters will look at the losses. Alabama lost to the #1 team in the nation and Bama gets in...I hope wink


I think the only that hurts Bama in this, is that they lost at home! I think they deserve it, but think the home loss will weigh heavy on the voters!

Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skinny] #219060
11/13/11 10:11 PM
11/13/11 10:11 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 51,948
Round ‘bout there
C
Clem Offline
Mildly Quirky
Clem  Offline
Mildly Quirky
C
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 51,948
Round ‘bout there
Those computers are probably sitting in a quiet hotel suite somewhere, smoking cigars and sipping 10W-40, and thinking "How can we screw up the programmed system we have no control over that takes data, wins, losses and strength of schedule, and create a BCS nightmare? Hahahahahahahaha!"

In 2004 with Aubrun, we heard "the system" is set up that way and that's how it happens.

Or did they get manipulated then to achieve an end result the way LSU and Bama will get manipulated so they don't have a rematch?

Or ... maybe it's not a conspiracy, the data gets input and the numbers get spit out to five or six decimal places based on some egghead formulas.

If we have a playoff, who determines the playoff teams? The sportswriters everyone hates? The computers everyone hates?

Division 1-AA, II, III and NAIA's 43 divisions all have playoffs THAT WORK. Dammit.


"Hunting Politics are stupid!" - Farm Hunter

"Bible says you shouldn't put sugar in your cornbread." Dustin, 2013

"Best I can figure 97.365% of the general public is a paint chip eating, mouth breathing, certified dumbass." BCLC, 2020
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Little Foot] #219123
11/14/11 12:47 AM
11/14/11 12:47 AM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,340
Jackson County
B
BrentM Offline
Mr. Turkey
BrentM  Offline
Mr. Turkey
B
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,340
Jackson County
Originally Posted By: Little Foot
Originally Posted By: Southwood7
I think Bama's best chance to get in the NC game is for LSU to win out. If/when Oklahoma beats Oklahoma state, the voters will look at the losses. Alabama lost to the #1 team in the nation and Bama gets in...I hope wink


I think the only that hurts Bama in this, is that they lost at home! I think they deserve it, but think the home loss will weigh heavy on the voters!


Oklahoma lost at home too......to a 30 point underdog. If you try to make a case for Oregon, you must remember this: LSU had suspended Jefferson and a couple of other key players for the first part of the season, but they still beat Oregon by double digits. Now you must ask yourself if LSU could have beaten Alabama if Jarrett Lee had qb'd the whole game. I don't think LSU could have scored on Alabama with Lee if they had played 8 quarters.
If OSU beats Oklahoma they deserve to get a shot, but once you get down to one-loss teams, Alabama is by far the best choice.

Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skinny] #219187
11/14/11 08:14 AM
11/14/11 08:14 AM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,896
AL
H
hunterbuck Offline
Booner
hunterbuck  Offline
Booner
H
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,896
AL
The way the computers are set up either definitely prefer "offensive" minded teams, or they just plain favor Big 12 teams period. They absolutely LOVE the Big 12 teams, even though they have proven time and time again to be fodder for every team in the BCSNC game except OU in 2000. The Big 12 is 1-5 in BCSNC games....while the SEC is 7-0.

Brent, you're right on Oregon as well. Oregon played a weakened LSU, and ended up scoring a trash td with about 20 seconds left on the clock to make it a 13 point loss instead of a 20 point loss. The big arguement is that even though the game was played on a neutral field, that there were about 75% LSU fans there. Well, last time I checked, home field is worth no more than 3 points. That still leaves a whole lot of points out there unaccounted for from Oregon's standpoint. Besides...it's not like Oregon's "high flying" offense could even put up points against an Auburn defense last year that wasn't exactly one of the best SEC defenses to ever hit the field.

All that aside...it sucks that we didn't handle our own business in a game that we statistically dominated against LSU.

Last edited by hunterbuck; 11/14/11 08:19 AM.

"You think I care? Roll Damn Tide"

Have you tried Google?
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: hunterbuck] #219221
11/14/11 09:31 AM
11/14/11 09:31 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,924
Decatur
chevyman Offline
12 point
chevyman  Offline
12 point
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,924
Decatur
Originally Posted By: hunterbuck
The way the computers are set up either definitely prefer "offensive" minded teams, or they just plain favor Big 12 teams period. They absolutely LOVE the Big 12 teams, even though they have proven time and time again to be fodder for every team in the BCSNC game except OU in 2000. The Big 12 is 1-5 in BCSNC games....while the SEC is 7-0.

Brent, you're right on Oregon as well. Oregon played a weakened LSU, and ended up scoring a trash td with about 20 seconds left on the clock to make it a 13 point loss instead of a 20 point loss. The big arguement is that even though the game was played on a neutral field, that there were about 75% LSU fans there. Well, last time I checked, home field is worth no more than 3 points. That still leaves a whole lot of points out there unaccounted for from Oregon's standpoint. Besides...it's not like Oregon's "high flying" offense could even put up points against an Auburn defense last year that wasn't exactly one of the best SEC defenses to ever hit the field.

All that aside...it sucks that we didn't handle our own business in a game that we statistically dominated against LSU.


Well said


Wisdom doesn't always come with age.
Sometimes age shows up all by itself.
Roll Tide
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: hunterbuck] #219630
11/14/11 07:19 PM
11/14/11 07:19 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,688
Falkville
MTeague Offline
14 point
MTeague  Offline
14 point
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,688
Falkville
Originally Posted By: hunterbuck
The way the computers are set up either definitely prefer "offensive" minded teams, or they just plain favor Big 12 teams period. They absolutely LOVE the Big 12 teams, even though they have proven time and time again to be fodder for every team in the BCSNC game except OU in 2000. The Big 12 is 1-5 in BCSNC games....while the SEC is 7-0.

Brent, you're right on Oregon as well. Oregon played a weakened LSU, and ended up scoring a trash td with about 20 seconds left on the clock to make it a 13 point loss instead of a 20 point loss. The big arguement is that even though the game was played on a neutral field, that there were about 75% LSU fans there. Well, last time I checked, home field is worth no more than 3 points. That still leaves a whole lot of points out there unaccounted for from Oregon's standpoint. Besides...it's not like Oregon's "high flying" offense could even put up points against an Auburn defense last year that wasn't exactly one of the best SEC defenses to ever hit the field.

All that aside...it sucks that we didn't handle our own business in a game that we statistically dominated against LSU.


This don't really look like domination to me!!!


Team Stat Comparison
LSU Alabama
1st Downs 15 17
Total Yards 239 295
Passing 91 199
Rushing 148 96
Penalties 7-56 6-73
3rd Down Conversions 3-11 5-13
4th Down Conversions 0-0 0-0
Turnovers 2 2
Possession 29:54 30:06
Passing Leaders
LSU C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT
Jefferson 6/10 67 6.7 0 0
Alabama C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT
McCarron 16/28 199 7.1 0 1
Rushing Leaders
LSU CAR YDS AVG TD LG
Ford 11 72 6.5 0 15
Jefferson 11 43 3.9 0 18
Alabama CAR YDS AVG TD LG
Richardson 23 89 3.9 0 24
Lacy 5 19 3.8 0 20
Receiving Leaders
LSU REC YDS AVG TD LG
Shepard 2 39 19.5 0 34
Randle 2 19 9.5 0 13
Alabama REC YDS AVG TD LG
Richardson 5 80 16.0 0 39
Maze 6 61 10.2 0 19
Scoring Summary
SECOND QUARTER LSU ALA
FG 03:53 Jeremy Shelley 34 Yd 0 3
FG 00:00 Drew Alleman 19 Yd 3 3
THIRD QUARTER LSU ALA
FG 07:56 Cade Foster 46 Yd 3 6
FOURTH QUARTER LSU ALA
FG 14:13 Drew Alleman 30 Yd 6 6
OVERTIME LSU ALA
FG Drew Alleman 25 Yd 9 6


I had much rather be tried by twelve than carried to my grave by six!!!!

Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skinny] #219657
11/14/11 07:44 PM
11/14/11 07:44 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 15,547
Panhandle Florida
PaschalBD Offline
Used to be TiderBD
PaschalBD  Offline
Used to be TiderBD
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 15,547
Panhandle Florida
Bama should have won the game by atleast 16 points. You know if's and buts.


A servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ.


USAF Veteran
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: MTeague] #219681
11/14/11 08:05 PM
11/14/11 08:05 PM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,896
AL
H
hunterbuck Offline
Booner
hunterbuck  Offline
Booner
H
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,896
AL
Originally Posted By: MTeague
Originally Posted By: hunterbuck
The way the computers are set up either definitely prefer "offensive" minded teams, or they just plain favor Big 12 teams period. They absolutely LOVE the Big 12 teams, even though they have proven time and time again to be fodder for every team in the BCSNC game except OU in 2000. The Big 12 is 1-5 in BCSNC games....while the SEC is 7-0.

Brent, you're right on Oregon as well. Oregon played a weakened LSU, and ended up scoring a trash td with about 20 seconds left on the clock to make it a 13 point loss instead of a 20 point loss. The big arguement is that even though the game was played on a neutral field, that there were about 75% LSU fans there. Well, last time I checked, home field is worth no more than 3 points. That still leaves a whole lot of points out there unaccounted for from Oregon's standpoint. Besides...it's not like Oregon's "high flying" offense could even put up points against an Auburn defense last year that wasn't exactly one of the best SEC defenses to ever hit the field.

All that aside...it sucks that we didn't handle our own business in a game that we statistically dominated against LSU.


This don't really look like domination to me!!!


You have to realize that most teams' idea of domination isn't the same as Auburn's. If anyone knows domination...they know it. 4 different times this year, to be exact.

However, while watching the game, at no point before the clock hitting zero in regulation did I ever feel like LSU controlled the game in any way. I did feel as if Bama dictated the game the entire way. Unfortunately, when the clock hit zero at the end of regulation, I knew Bama had lost the upper hand due to field goal kicking. The two could have probably played until now and neither would have scored a td.


"You think I care? Roll Damn Tide"

Have you tried Google?
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: hunterbuck] #220729
11/15/11 09:48 PM
11/15/11 09:48 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,688
Falkville
MTeague Offline
14 point
MTeague  Offline
14 point
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,688
Falkville
Originally Posted By: hunterbuck
Originally Posted By: MTeague
Originally Posted By: hunterbuck
The way the computers are set up either definitely prefer "offensive" minded teams, or they just plain favor Big 12 teams period. They absolutely LOVE the Big 12 teams, even though they have proven time and time again to be fodder for every team in the BCSNC game except OU in 2000. The Big 12 is 1-5 in BCSNC games....while the SEC is 7-0.

Brent, you're right on Oregon as well. Oregon played a weakened LSU, and ended up scoring a trash td with about 20 seconds left on the clock to make it a 13 point loss instead of a 20 point loss. The big arguement is that even though the game was played on a neutral field, that there were about 75% LSU fans there. Well, last time I checked, home field is worth no more than 3 points. That still leaves a whole lot of points out there unaccounted for from Oregon's standpoint. Besides...it's not like Oregon's "high flying" offense could even put up points against an Auburn defense last year that wasn't exactly one of the best SEC defenses to ever hit the field.

All that aside...it sucks that we didn't handle our own business in a game that we statistically dominated against LSU.


This don't really look like domination to me!!!


You have to realize that most teams' idea of domination isn't the same as Auburn's. If anyone knows domination...they know it. 4 different times this year, to be exact.

However, while watching the game, at no point before the clock hitting zero in regulation did I ever feel like LSU controlled the game in any way. I did feel as if Bama dictated the game the entire way. Unfortunately, when the clock hit zero at the end of regulation, I knew Bama had lost the upper hand due to field goal kicking. The two could have probably played until now and neither would have scored a td.



But that is not what you said! You said Alabama dominated LSU statistically in the game!


I had much rather be tried by twelve than carried to my grave by six!!!!

Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skinny] #220784
11/15/11 10:30 PM
11/15/11 10:30 PM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,896
AL
H
hunterbuck Offline
Booner
hunterbuck  Offline
Booner
H
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,896
AL
Ok...Bama had more total yards, percentage-wise by quite a bit. Bama had 6 scoring opportunities, and LSU had 3. Bama had more first downs. Bama was better on 3rd down efficiency. Bama averaged right at a yard more per play. Bama ran more plays. Bama only punted 2 times to LSU's 6.

I guess none of that is winning the statistical battle to you?

Scoreboard is all that matters, though.





"You think I care? Roll Damn Tide"

Have you tried Google?
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: hunterbuck] #220863
11/16/11 12:11 AM
11/16/11 12:11 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 23,914
Clarksville, TN /Greenville, ...
bill Offline
Freak of Nature
bill  Offline
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 23,914
Clarksville, TN /Greenville, ...
Ph
Originally Posted By: hunterbuck


Scoreboard is all that matters, though.





Really? Because you have spent the last week crying abouts it and wasting bandwidth. Alabama is a very good team but lsu is better. They proved it in Alabamas house.


"Political debate: when charlatans come together to discuss their principles"
-
Bauvard
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skinny] #220891
11/16/11 05:52 AM
11/16/11 05:52 AM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,896
AL
H
hunterbuck Offline
Booner
hunterbuck  Offline
Booner
H
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,896
AL
I think I'll step it up some, since my posting bothers you so much, bill.


"You think I care? Roll Damn Tide"

Have you tried Google?
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: hunterbuck] #220894
11/16/11 05:59 AM
11/16/11 05:59 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 12,788
Thomasville, AL
H
Hogwild Offline
Booner
Hogwild  Offline
Booner
H
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 12,788
Thomasville, AL
Quote:
Bama only punted 2 times to LSU's 6


Take those dumba$$ missed FG's into account and you just PROVED how much smarter Les was and how much better LSU's Special Teams were!

Quote:
I think I'll step it up some


I really think you should!!

You are REALLY entertaining me!!!! smile

Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: hunterbuck] #220923
11/16/11 07:53 AM
11/16/11 07:53 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 23,914
Clarksville, TN /Greenville, ...
bill Offline
Freak of Nature
bill  Offline
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 23,914
Clarksville, TN /Greenville, ...
Originally Posted By: hunterbuck
I think I'll step it up some, since my posting bothers you so much, bill.


Who says it bothers me? I actually like it. Every time a bama fan points at shuter all we have to do is point back at you or timbercruiser.


"Political debate: when charlatans come together to discuss their principles"
-
Bauvard
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skinny] #220934
11/16/11 08:16 AM
11/16/11 08:16 AM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,896
AL
H
hunterbuck Offline
Booner
hunterbuck  Offline
Booner
H
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,896
AL
It must bother you. You love to stalk my posts and comment on pretty much every one of them. It either bothers you, or you admire me.

The problem with you, bill...is you want to attack the poster, rather than take issue with what is posted. Why is that?


"You think I care? Roll Damn Tide"

Have you tried Google?
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skinny] #220939
11/16/11 08:21 AM
11/16/11 08:21 AM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 20,017
PDL, Fl
T
timbercruiser Offline
Freak of Nature
timbercruiser  Offline
Freak of Nature
T
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 20,017
PDL, Fl
I would have thought that a coach as highly regarded as Saban would have known that those missed field goals in the LSU game would not have been good. Maybe we need a new coach? Just because Saban sees his kickers make 50 yarders with a fair percentage in practice doesn't mean that you need to let your kicker try one in a game where 3 points are a premium. Heck, they shouldn't have let Foster make that 46 yarder in the third quarter, it should have been missed. Guarantee that Cheesedip would have known those kicks would not have been good........... laughup

Last edited by timbercruiser; 11/16/11 08:28 AM. Reason: incomplete
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: hunterbuck] #221166
11/16/11 01:27 PM
11/16/11 01:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 23,914
Clarksville, TN /Greenville, ...
bill Offline
Freak of Nature
bill  Offline
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 23,914
Clarksville, TN /Greenville, ...
HB, I don't have to stalk your post. You are way more involved in any AU threads than you are Alabama.


"Political debate: when charlatans come together to discuss their principles"
-
Bauvard
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skinny] #221170
11/16/11 01:36 PM
11/16/11 01:36 PM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,896
AL
H
hunterbuck Offline
Booner
hunterbuck  Offline
Booner
H
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,896
AL
And you feel the need to respond to every one of them.


"You think I care? Roll Damn Tide"

Have you tried Google?
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: hunterbuck] #221203
11/16/11 02:18 PM
11/16/11 02:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 23,914
Clarksville, TN /Greenville, ...
bill Offline
Freak of Nature
bill  Offline
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 23,914
Clarksville, TN /Greenville, ...
Originally Posted By: hunterbuck
And you feel the need to respond to every one of them.


Well, since I don't spend all my time and energy posting garbage about Alabama I have the time. Did you know Alabama was having a pretty good season?


"Political debate: when charlatans come together to discuss their principles"
-
Bauvard
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skinny] #221210
11/16/11 02:23 PM
11/16/11 02:23 PM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,896
AL
H
hunterbuck Offline
Booner
hunterbuck  Offline
Booner
H
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,896
AL
Yep...I'm aware of it. Like it. Getting pretty used to it.

2nd most wins in the nation since 2008, behind only Boise St.

It's pretty rough when last year's 10 win season is viewed as a major disappointment. No excuses, either.


"You think I care? Roll Damn Tide"

Have you tried Google?
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: hunterbuck] #221227
11/16/11 02:42 PM
11/16/11 02:42 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 25,681
Locust Fork, Alabama
BC Offline
Freak of Nature
BC  Offline
Freak of Nature
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 25,681
Locust Fork, Alabama
Originally Posted By: hunterbuck

2nd most wins in the nation since 2008, behind only Boise St.



With a schedule that is exponentially more difficult.


"Some men are mere hunters; others are turkey hunters."

-- Archibald Rutledge
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: BC] #221421
11/16/11 07:35 PM
11/16/11 07:35 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 15,547
Panhandle Florida
PaschalBD Offline
Used to be TiderBD
PaschalBD  Offline
Used to be TiderBD
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 15,547
Panhandle Florida




With a schedule that is exponentially more difficult. [/quote]

Your gonna have to use smaller words if you want some of these guys to keep up.


A servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ.


USAF Veteran
Re: Stanford and Boise lost [Re: Skinny] #221680
11/17/11 02:30 AM
11/17/11 02:30 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,828
West Tennessee
BamaProud Offline
Booner
BamaProud  Offline
Booner
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,828
West Tennessee
hunterbuck, I think bill has a new crush. I'm heartbroken. bill you can't quit BamaProud!


Save the Little ones for the little ones
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Aldeer.com Copyright 2001-2023 Aldeer LLP.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1.1
(Release build 20180111)
Page Time: 0.107s Queries: 15 (0.025s) Memory: 3.5028 MB (Peak: 4.0044 MB) Zlib disabled. Server Time: 2024-04-19 02:49:52 UTC