|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 registered members (DoubleShoalsJR, specialk, Paxamus, curt99rsv, BayedUp, JohnG, Ben2, Peach, SC53, Bmyers142, Ruger7mag, Ant67, jaredhunts, Paint Rock 00, low wall, roll_tide_hunts, RCHRR, CatfishJunkie, Drycreek, Whiskey9, CAL, capehorn24, ParrotHead89, GrandSlam, jake5050, Sandmtnslayer, hayman, Chaser357, Dragfan66, Semo, JA, shootnmiss, Kang, Ray_Coon, !shiloh!, Dubie, COOTER, Gobble4me757, Auburn_03, Shmoe, globe, GATA87, StateLine, FPPop, kpswihart, filespinner, Chad Burnette, sloughfoot, graydw1, Prohunter3509, Skullworks, DuckDown11, kyles, jsubrett6, 5 invisible),
680
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Savage Lightweight Hunter?
[Re: ChrisAU]
#2081858
04/07/17 02:20 AM
04/07/17 02:20 AM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670 NW Alabama
R_H_Clark
Leupold Pro Staff
|
Leupold Pro Staff
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670
NW Alabama
|
It would be easily around 5 lbs 12 oz with a 2.5-8x36 and a nylon sling, but that may be too light. Chris,picking a light rifle so you can use the scope you want without having a 10 pound package is a valid school of thought.As long as it balances and handles to your expectations,it doesn't matter what anyone thinks but you. Personally,I am finding that my 7 lb all up rifle is easier to shoot well than my 6 lb all up rifle.I just haven't yet decided if weight is the deciding factor or not.The heavier rifle fits me better and has a heavier barrel which won't heat up so quick.
|
|
|
|