I just saw on yahoo that he is throwing in the towel and urging his supporters to vote Hitler!

Ok I'll agree with you here. I was a Cruz supporter. Still am because we need every man like him in the senate we can get. But, like you I'm not afraid to take off the gloves with respect to Trump. And I have no problem in speaking out against the nomination of Trump in the 1st place. It makes no difference now as he is our nominee. But should he lose it needs to be a lesson learned for our fellow conservatives.

In all honesty, I don't know what's going to happen. I know polls get rigged and demos are overpolled consistently. After Romney, I just don't know what to make of them. Some said voter turnout hurt Romney, but he received 93% of the republican vote. Obama only received 92%. Romney still lost. Those independent/undecided voters mean a lot and are never polled accurately. So while I believe there is ample evidence to say the polls aren't realistic due to oversampling, we all need to be prepared that it's also due to a large # of undecideds. That is a reality that does concern me. It should concern everyone that wants HRC to lose.

You can get 100% of the vote in Ladd Peebles stadium, and I can get 60% of the vote in Bryant Denny, and I win. Percentages don't matter without quantities of voters

Correction: Romney received 97%. Percentages of quatities do matter. To my point: Obama 53% to Romney 47% of independents and Obama 67% to 33% of moderates. Romey won big with the conservative base, but lost with the moderate/independent vote. You can live happy with those Bryant Denny people and if I'm the liberal I'll ignore the Ladd Peebles because they are voting for me no matter. I'll also bring in the undecideds in Jordan-Hare. I get your analogy, but there aren't just 2 stadiums voting

It was Weld, not Johnson. He was dogging out Trump and some idiot reporter took it to mean he was pro-clinton. Nope - not throwing in the towel and not endorsing that idiot woman.

Perch- your avatar gave me a seizure a few minutes ago.

Sue his azz. He should know better

I am voting FOR a conservative candidate. Trump is not a conservative.

He is the more conservative of the two that have a chance to win. Voting for anyone other than those two is wasting time and a chance to have a say in who is going to lead our country.

I don't like the two who have a chance to win. I am having a say - you just don't like it.

That's plain stupid. Might as well vote for Hillary, of your conservative choices, none have a snowballs chance in hell

So who you voting for?

The dopehead. aka libertarian party candidate.

For both Geno and Texas: I respect everyones right to vote for who they feel is the best candidate but until there is a viable third party, it is a wasted vote. Not being personal but calling it like I see it, you're a dumb_ss if you think your vote for a third party candidate matters. All you did was waste your time driving to the polling station. Hillary automatically has 48% of the population voting for her because she is giving them free stuff (that the working Americans are paying for through our taxes). If people like you that are not a Hillary supporter don't vote for the candidate opposing her that actually has a chance to win, then your essentially helping her get elected. I dont like Trump any better than a lot of the guys on here but I'm smart enough to recognize that if I dont vote or waste my vote on someone without any chance to win then I am essentially helping Hillary get elected and might as well have just voted for her. Based on what I've seen, she's a Washington insider that really should be in jail along with most of her staff. Trumps distasteful but he's a whole lot more palatable than Hillary and there are really only two candidates in this race. You're voting for one of the other no mater how you vote. I'm making my vote count by voting against Hillary by voting for Trump. 4 more years of democratic policy will put this country in a place from which things will be unrecoverable. We need to clean house in Washington.

abolt300 - don't sweat it man, I am very used to it. Below is my standard reply.

The vote I cast is for the candidate I vote for and no one else. I am morally and ethically obligated to vote for the person whom I think will do the best job in office, thereby doing everything in my power to make this part of the world a better place.

Those who think it is more important to keep someone out than to vote someone in lack the moral fortitude required to vote with their heart and weaken the rest of the world by knowingly doing less than they could.

I normally call people a coward after saying all that for not being willing to vote their heart. I'll hold off today because I sometimes come off as being mad when I'm not.

I have voted libertarian since 1988 and most likely will until I die.

And every election cycle that goes that way, further perpetuates the problem of keeping a 3rd Party from becoming "viable."

Johnson/Weld 2016

So are you like most of the libertarian voters and just for legalization of mary jane? That is predominantly what the recent libertarians have run on and good ol GJ has made sure everyone knows he's for it. I actually watched an interview with Johnson, and to be honest I wouldnt hire him as warehouse help or to deliver newspapers, let alone put him in any decision making capacity. Let's have a legitimate discussion. What does Johnson stand for that you really like?

No. I truly don't care if it is legal or not.

I think it should be legal just so we will stop wasting gobs of money on incarcerating people for stupid stuff.

I vote for the libertarian party because they are the only one who believes smaller central government is a good thing.

And I am out until Monday morning. I will be glad to have that discussion then.

I may be able to look in some this afternoon and weekend.