|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 registered members (sevenup, sw1002, jake5050, farmerjay, auman, Morris, beeline08, BAR1225, mzzy, Dog, kodiak06, JAT, Frankie, DThrash, Narrow Gap, Beadlescomb, 3Gs, woodduck, Mulcher, dustymac, jawbone, NoHuntin, 1 invisible),
815
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: no camping on premier hunting leases property?
[Re: casper36092]
#1120202
10/21/14 12:42 PM
10/21/14 12:42 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 10,979 wedowee
daniel white
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 10,979
wedowee
|
Sorta like dog hunting. A few bad apples sours the whole pie.
"You do and it will be the biggest mistake you ever made, you Texas brush popper" John Wayne
|
|
|
Re: no camping on premier hunting leases property?
[Re: casper36092]
#1120226
10/21/14 01:06 PM
10/21/14 01:06 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 25,687 South Alabama
Rebelman
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 25,687
South Alabama
|
No, no, no...let me answer this before bad information gets posted.
First off, there is a legal issue. Each state, sometimes each county, has different laws which determine a landlord/tenant relationship. There is an enhanced liability when a lessor becomes a landlord.
Secondly, there is an environmental issue. Each state, sometimes each count, has specs to which waste is treated. Hunt clubs have a tendency to not be concerned with those issue as ultimately the landowner is liable and that liability is not easily passed on to the lessee.
Thirdly, there is an aesthetic issue. Hunt clubs have a tendency to haul crap onto the lease simply because their wife told them they couldn't keep it in the back yard. Truthfully, it should have been sold as scrap a decade ago. Because it wasn't road worthy when they hauled it to the lease they aren't going to haul it away when they don't renew the lease. I have seen landowners pay thousands of dollars for camps to be remediated.
Lastly, large landowners operate their business on a very low head count. They have to to survive and keep rates at the rate they are. Until lessees are willing to pay extra for the aforementioned issues, these companies are not going to hire someone to allocate time to ensure proper care is taken to avoid costly compliance issues.
|
|
|
|