</a JR Holmes Oil Company </a Shark Guard Southeast Woods and Whitetail Mayer Insurance Services LLC
Aldeer Classifieds
Mathews lift 29.5
by Bows4evr. 04/18/24 09:53 PM
Trade or sell
by buzzbait. 04/18/24 05:07 PM
95 Ford F250 HD
by Rudy. 04/18/24 02:15 PM
WTB RugerMK IV 22/45 tactical
by JLavender. 04/17/24 08:08 PM
2011 Toyota RAV4
by jsubrett6. 04/16/24 10:00 PM
Serious Deer Talk
Tdogs mount
by Jdkprp70. 04/18/24 09:55 PM
Windy.com
by quailman. 04/18/24 09:46 PM
First cwd transmission to human?
by donia. 04/18/24 06:53 AM
seems like
by donia. 04/17/24 04:01 PM
Southern Illinois Hunting
by jdhunter2011. 04/17/24 11:42 AM
April
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Land, Leases, Hunting Clubs
Help against Timber Company
by winlamberth. 04/17/24 11:31 PM
South Side Hunting Club (Baldwin County)
by Stickslinger91. 04/15/24 10:38 AM
Lease Prices in Lamar Co.
by Luxfisher. 04/12/24 05:38 PM
Kansas Muzzleloader/Bow
by Letshunt. 04/11/24 03:15 PM
G&E Hunting Club Questions
by booner. 04/11/24 01:11 PM
Who's Online Now
30 registered members (BAR1225, Mulcher, JAT, dustymac, NoHuntin, Frankie, Shane99, Beadlescomb, TexasHuntress, cullbuck, GmeHunter, Vernon Tull, Narrow Gap, Lonster, sw1002, jawbone, paintrock, handihunter, Whild_Bill, woodduck, RidgeRanger, Gulfcoast, Claims Rep., Gobble4me757, AJones, hyco, Tigger85, Hester, 2 invisible), 530 guests, and 0 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: SCOTUS won't review 2020 election [Re: metalmuncher] #3359267
02/22/21 09:24 PM
02/22/21 09:24 PM
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 22,129
blount county alabama
jwalker77 Offline
Pumpkin
jwalker77  Offline
Pumpkin
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 22,129
blount county alabama
Originally Posted by metalmuncher
Originally Posted by Goatkiller

The court has become political. I think they did this because they are afraid of the Democrats and know there will be at least some attempt at some level to expand their Court. I would anticipate that they have no plans to do their dam job under Biden. They are going to let the Democrats to whatever whenever until something happens that is so bold faced they have to take it up.

Same way they operated under Obama.



Well, just how much bolder can they get? They stole a presidential election right under our noses, WITH US ALL WATCHING.

Yessir. We are in a whole new place. They are telling us that loud and clear. This is not the America you thought you lived in.

Re: SCOTUS won't review 2020 election [Re: WmHunter] #3359268
02/22/21 09:25 PM
02/22/21 09:25 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 2,177
Eastbound and Down
dead_eye Offline
8 point
dead_eye  Offline
8 point
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 2,177
Eastbound and Down
Paging doekiller...oh wait. Yalls ass dun ran him off

Re: SCOTUS won't review 2020 election [Re: dead_eye] #3359369
02/23/21 12:13 AM
02/23/21 12:13 AM
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,073
Free State of Winston
F
FreeStateHunter Offline
They Call Me Gator 🐊
FreeStateHunter  Offline
They Call Me Gator 🐊
F
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,073
Free State of Winston
Originally Posted by dead_eye
Paging doekiller...oh wait. Yalls ass dun ran him off


Actually Doekiller said this is exactly what would happen back in December and everybody gave him so much crap he hasn’t come back. Well it appears he knew exactly what he was talking about.

Re: SCOTUS won't review 2020 election [Re: WmHunter] #3359376
02/23/21 01:24 AM
02/23/21 01:24 AM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,378
Hoover, AL
G
GmeHunter Online content
8 point
GmeHunter  Online Content
8 point
G
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,378
Hoover, AL
Originally Posted by WmHunter
The Supreme Court decision was released today to not review the executive and judicial branches of Pennsylvania changing that state's election laws.
The decision was 6-3, which means Roberts and new court member Barrett betrayed the Constitution. I suspect this means all the other pending cases will eventually get the same cold shoulder.

https://www.wnd.com/2021/02/3-supre...ctices-result-catastrophic-consequences/


Cocaine Mitch screwed us with the Judges.
Pedophile Pence screwed us not allowing the States Legislatures to decide the electoral college.
The SCOTUS refuses to even entertain the lawsuits or look at the evidence.

Fellas, we live in dangerous times.

Food and gas prices are about to skyrocket and companies are about to start shedding workers at an alarming rate.

I wish I owned about 20 acres of land and had my fields ready to plant and livestock too. We all need to get rid of debt as quick as possible.

I watched folks talk on a Rumble where the a source close to the secret service said Trump had a close call with an assasination attempt on his life in December. That is when he was laying low.

If by some miracle by the mid-term election, we can get rid of those dominion machines and stop the ballot harvesting post election - we all need to pray that Trump can help candidates who won't cow tow to the deep state.

Re: SCOTUS won't review 2020 election [Re: WmHunter] #3359381
02/23/21 02:12 AM
02/23/21 02:12 AM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 8,113
Moundville, Al
SuperSpike Offline
40 Year Old Bowhunting Virgin
SuperSpike  Offline
40 Year Old Bowhunting Virgin
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 8,113
Moundville, Al
The SCOTUS does not have a conservative lean to it. People think because a conservative prez nominated them that they are conservative by default and that’s not true. The corruption has no end. It’s in every branch. Nobody is for the people anymore except we the people. Politicians and the courts will always vote and rule on what’s in their best interests.

Re: SCOTUS won't review 2020 election [Re: WmHunter] #3359398
02/23/21 06:56 AM
02/23/21 06:56 AM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 19,651
Pelham
Ben2 Offline
Old Mossy Horns
Ben2  Offline
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 19,651
Pelham
Sounds like a lot of protests need to take place on the steps of the SCOTUS

Re: SCOTUS won't review 2020 election [Re: WmHunter] #3359483
02/23/21 09:47 AM
02/23/21 09:47 AM
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,230
Semmes, AL
HippieKiller Offline
10 point
HippieKiller  Offline
10 point
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,230
Semmes, AL
Or maybe... just maybe... there isn't as much "verifiable proof" as we've been told.


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." - Thomas Jefferson
Re: SCOTUS won't review 2020 election [Re: HippieKiller] #3359489
02/23/21 09:55 AM
02/23/21 09:55 AM
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,073
Free State of Winston
F
FreeStateHunter Offline
They Call Me Gator 🐊
FreeStateHunter  Offline
They Call Me Gator 🐊
F
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,073
Free State of Winston
Originally Posted by HippieKiller
Or maybe... just maybe... there isn't as much "verifiable proof" as we've been told.

Re: SCOTUS won't review 2020 election [Re: FreeStateHunter] #3359499
02/23/21 10:20 AM
02/23/21 10:20 AM
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 16,822
Banana Republic
jb20 Offline
Old Mossy Horns
jb20  Offline
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 16,822
Banana Republic
Originally Posted by FreeStateHunter
Originally Posted by HippieKiller
Or maybe... just maybe... there isn't as much "verifiable proof" as we've been told.


Um... evidence is very clear that they changed election laws....


They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Ben Franklin
Re: SCOTUS won't review 2020 election [Re: jb20] #3359519
02/23/21 10:35 AM
02/23/21 10:35 AM
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,073
Free State of Winston
F
FreeStateHunter Offline
They Call Me Gator 🐊
FreeStateHunter  Offline
They Call Me Gator 🐊
F
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,073
Free State of Winston
Originally Posted by jb20
Originally Posted by FreeStateHunter
Originally Posted by HippieKiller
Or maybe... just maybe... there isn't as much "verifiable proof" as we've been told.


Um... evidence is very clear that they changed election laws....


So here's my point in quoting hippiekiller on that...... do we know that what they did even broke the law? You seem sure of it so cite the PA code that was broken. I personally don't because i'm not a lawyer. Doekiller was a lawyer and was pretty certain there was no evidence, which every court in the land has agreed to. Doekiller wasn't a commie liberal, just a lawyer who knows how to read evidence. I'm going to side with the fact there probably wasn't enough evidence of a crime committed to bring it to court.

Re: SCOTUS won't review 2020 election [Re: WmHunter] #3359522
02/23/21 10:41 AM
02/23/21 10:41 AM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,157
B'ham
Goatkiller Offline
14 point
Goatkiller  Offline
14 point
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,157
B'ham
Doekiller is not a lawyer that specializes in election law.... so his opinion doesn't carry any water for me. That's like asking an Electrical Engineer a Civil Engineering question.

At some level people need to realize they don't want to know the Truth or objectively think for themselves.


The fact that the Democrat election officials in many districts changed the rules which is a violation of the United States Constitution should be enough. They can't do that. It was against Federal Law not even their respective State's laws. They did it. The evidence of this cannot be refuted.

SCOTUS... they ignored it.

What are they going to ignore next? Are they going to ignore violation of our 1st Amendment, 2nd Amendement, etc.?






No government employees were harmed in the making of this mess.
Re: SCOTUS won't review 2020 election [Re: FreeStateHunter] #3359526
02/23/21 10:44 AM
02/23/21 10:44 AM
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 16,822
Banana Republic
jb20 Offline
Old Mossy Horns
jb20  Offline
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 16,822
Banana Republic
Originally Posted by FreeStateHunter
Originally Posted by jb20
Originally Posted by FreeStateHunter
Originally Posted by HippieKiller
Or maybe... just maybe... there isn't as much "verifiable proof" as we've been told.


Um... evidence is very clear that they changed election laws....


So here's my point in quoting hippiekiller on that...... do we know that what they did even broke the law? You seem sure of it so cite the PA code that was broken. I personally don't because i'm not a lawyer. Doekiller was a lawyer and was pretty certain there was no evidence, which every court in the land has agreed to. Doekiller wasn't a commie liberal, just a lawyer who knows how to read evidence. I'm going to side with the fact there probably wasn't enough evidence of a crime committed to bring it to court.

I don't know the law but I do know common sense...im all for states to set their own laws but whenever those laws have consequences for the rest of America federal laws need to be followed...the problem and downfall of America is being tied up in political correctness and and legal wording vs right and wrong


They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Ben Franklin
Re: SCOTUS won't review 2020 election [Re: Goatkiller] #3359531
02/23/21 10:49 AM
02/23/21 10:49 AM
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,073
Free State of Winston
F
FreeStateHunter Offline
They Call Me Gator 🐊
FreeStateHunter  Offline
They Call Me Gator 🐊
F
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,073
Free State of Winston
Originally Posted by Goatkiller
Doekiller is not a lawyer that specializes in election law.... so his opinion doesn't carry any water for me. That's like asking an Electrical Engineer a Civil Engineering question.


So you would rather ask a liberal arts major a Civil Engineering question versus an Electrical Engineer because that's the equivalent of taking the advice/counsel of a bunch of non-lawyer members of this board and the press over a lawyer. That makes no sense. If his opinion doesn't carry any water for you that's great, but his opinion has been correct so far. Everyone else's on this board hasn't. That's worth looking at.

That doesn't take away from the fact that we've got to figure out a way to not let this happen again. It's not going to happen through the courts. The dems did it through having the volunteer numbers at every poll and at every location they could have volunteers all the way through the system. They worked the ground game in getting people out to vote, etc. If we don't do that for the next and every election there after we're screwed.

Re: SCOTUS won't review 2020 election [Re: WmHunter] #3359536
02/23/21 10:53 AM
02/23/21 10:53 AM
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,073
Free State of Winston
F
FreeStateHunter Offline
They Call Me Gator 🐊
FreeStateHunter  Offline
They Call Me Gator 🐊
F
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,073
Free State of Winston
You say that's in the constitution and federal law but where? Article 1 - Powers of the state, Article 2 - Powers of Congress, Article 3 - Powers of the Judicial, etc? There should be a specific USC that we can tie to it but no one has been able to do that yet.

Re: SCOTUS won't review 2020 election [Re: WmHunter] #3359538
02/23/21 10:57 AM
02/23/21 10:57 AM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,157
B'ham
Goatkiller Offline
14 point
Goatkiller  Offline
14 point
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,157
B'ham

Common sense isn't so common.


No government employees were harmed in the making of this mess.
Re: SCOTUS won't review 2020 election [Re: Goatkiller] #3359542
02/23/21 11:00 AM
02/23/21 11:00 AM
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,073
Free State of Winston
F
FreeStateHunter Offline
They Call Me Gator 🐊
FreeStateHunter  Offline
They Call Me Gator 🐊
F
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,073
Free State of Winston
Originally Posted by Goatkiller

Common sense isn't so common.



so you can't point it out? I think you've actually proven my point

Re: SCOTUS won't review 2020 election [Re: WmHunter] #3359543
02/23/21 11:03 AM
02/23/21 11:03 AM
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,073
Free State of Winston
F
FreeStateHunter Offline
They Call Me Gator 🐊
FreeStateHunter  Offline
They Call Me Gator 🐊
F
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,073
Free State of Winston
Again, everyone is wanting to argue over this and that and pretty much argue with one another but that doesnt change the point that we're hosed if we don't change something within our party. The way we approach campaigning or something. Instead of learning from the dems ground game we're all sitting here arguing with each other over if there's enough evidence for something that will never change and is completely out of our control. There's things we can control and we're not doing anything about it which is exactly what the libs want. But i dont have any common sense so please, carry on with your rat killin

Re: SCOTUS won't review 2020 election [Re: FreeStateHunter] #3359544
02/23/21 11:03 AM
02/23/21 11:03 AM
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 16,822
Banana Republic
jb20 Offline
Old Mossy Horns
jb20  Offline
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 16,822
Banana Republic
Originally Posted by FreeStateHunter
Originally Posted by Goatkiller

Common sense isn't so common.



so you can't point it out? I think you've actually proven my point

That was my point...we've thrown it out the window due to political correctness and legal wording...they should have made a case and outlawed what happened but since they didn't it won't stop anytime soon


They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Ben Franklin
Re: SCOTUS won't review 2020 election [Re: SouthBamaSlayer] #3359545
02/23/21 11:03 AM
02/23/21 11:03 AM
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 12,918
Old Florida
Geno Offline
Booner
Geno  Offline
Booner
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 12,918
Old Florida
Originally Posted by SouthBamaSlayer
Originally Posted by FreeStateHunter
I think this has less to do with them being a conservative/non-conservative court and more to do with them not wanting to be viewed as ruling from the judicial branch. Let's say they took the case(s) and ruled for Trump (which believe me, there's nothing I would have wanted more) and overturned the election results. People would lose their minds and there would be complete upheaval not just here at home but abroad as well, what kind of message would that send? The dems cheated, they got away with it and we must do whatever it takes to ensure it never happens again. That is obviously not going to be done at the Supreme court so start getting creative.

Who cares what they wanted to avoid? It’s not their job to worry about implications. It’s their job to rule on what is legal/constitutional.


Whoever is happy will make others happy too. Anne Frank
Re: SCOTUS won't review 2020 election [Re: FreeStateHunter] #3359554
02/23/21 11:20 AM
02/23/21 11:20 AM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,157
B'ham
Goatkiller Offline
14 point
Goatkiller  Offline
14 point
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,157
B'ham


The interpretation of Article 1 Section 4 is called the Elections Clause. I can't teach a political science class on here but if you don't know what you are talking about I can't help you with the subject at hand, in particular if you don't want to hear facts. Based on the comments re: position on Doekiller's opinon the assumption is that I am taking as evidence people's personal opinions from board. What? My evidence is jb20's post of some other member? What? This argument shows me a lack of critical thinking. Thus, no reason to continue.


No government employees were harmed in the making of this mess.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Aldeer.com Copyright 2001-2023 Aldeer LLP.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1.1
(Release build 20180111)
Page Time: 0.114s Queries: 15 (0.039s) Memory: 3.2897 MB (Peak: 3.5752 MB) Zlib disabled. Server Time: 2024-04-19 04:51:30 UTC