That's not a broken algorithm. Also, the hand counts in GA easily disprove what you're saying.

Georgia's recount was a farce. They re-counted the invalid votes AGAIN. An algorithm can be broken several ways. If there is not enough space allocated in the software for "Trump" votes you can "Break" the routine. Example "Trump votes" predicted to be 3 digits and you exceed the 999, you will have an error. Hope this helps you understand....

Every American watched the "cheat" when the vote count was stopped.
Adjustments needed to be made. We all know who won. DJT

When they recounted they recounted the cheating ballots for Biden how is that so hard to understand

Bunchofbullshit! They only re counted the illegal votes. The ones that have no signature verification and was illegally put in place without the state legislature voting to approve it.

And from the sounds of it, they pretty well introduce votes at any point of the counting or recounting process that they decide. Who's to believe that the crooked mfrs ain't cheating their butts off during a recount at any chance they can.

I think she was using those numbers as an example. I’m not sure she was saying that’s exactly how this one went down but it could’ve possibly been like that.

Just to throw gas on the fire, Lin Wood filed a lawsuit against the state of Ga in his own name. It claims the election was unconstitutional because of laws changed by a state judge. Election laws are changed by the State Legislature, not a liberal judge. This is like the suit filed in Pa, a judge extended vote counting and receiving ballots by several days. To be legal it should have been do by their legislature. If you have questions about Mrs Powell filing the suit, they are dealing with that on NEWSMAX this morning.

Still if there is an algorithm that switches votes, the hand count wouldn't be close to the original count. Illegal ballots are a different, separate issue. It is possible to have cheating with illegal ballots and not an algorithm or vice versa. All I'm saying is that the whole algorithm thing does not add up.

Spin it how you will but there is no way this is a good thing

Yes,
But would add this: she and Linn Wood better file a boatload of actual admissible evidence with their lawsuit in Georgia and any other state - or they will lose.
She can no longer just sit back and say we have Earth shattering evidence and not file it in court.

Bare legal claims in court pleading will not suffice.
They can claim whatever they want but without actual evidence FILED in court they will get nowhere.

Her case will also be based on a preponderance of evidence. If half of what she claims to have is what she actually has that should be no problem for her.

Agree on the preponderance standard - as this is a civil case not a criminal case.

But they have to file the actual and legally admissible evidence in the trial court or else there is nothing for the trial court much less
Georgia Supreme Court or eventually SCOTUS to review.

In Pennsylvania they only need evidence of mail in ballots received AFTER 8 pm November 3.
Then it is just a matter of proving how many - it is going to take over 80,000 such late votes to overturn Pennsylvania.

They overturn those two states and Trump wins.

I had no idea there were so many people smarter on this board than the sitting President......

Or his attorneys. Lots of folks here in the wrong profession.

Even if they had legitimate evidence in those two states and somehow manage to flip them that is only 36 Electoral votes. Biden still wins with 270 and is the President. It is going to take more than Georgia and Pennsylvania and the first step is actually producing any legitimate evidence.

How is having over 200 affidavits not legitimate evidence? Not trying to be an ass...just trying to understand.

Seems to me they set the machines to cheat and when "the water pipe busted" and the shut down the count they had to go get the illegal ballots out of the trunk of the car so when they did the recount on the machine they would have the same amount of paper ballots as the machine said

Beebs, you dont add up much either.

If there is an algorithm programmed into the voting machines that adds more votes to Biden, then it should be pretty easy to prove. Get a voting machine and make 5,000 Trump votes and then 5,000 Biden votes. If the numbers don't come out 50:50, case solved. It doesn't get any more objective than that.