It amazes me that so many accept the creation of crimes and then selling permission to commit those crimes as being a legitimate role of our government.
The state constitution that was ratified just last year declares, "the sole object and only legitimate end of government is to protect the citizen in the enjoyment of life, liberty, and property, and when the government assumes other functions it is usurpation and oppression".
How does creating crimes and then selling permission to commit those crimes fit that declaration? Is that not the very definition of "usurpation and oppression" that appears in our state constitution?
This is how I felt from day one while 90% of people were just happy they got to bait. The details matter. Either make baiting legal or dont. Selling privilege licenses with no conditions for approval other than paying the fee to do an otherwise illegal activity the state considers as unsportsmanlike and harmful to wildlife makes the original prohibition illegitimate. You will never see the state relax an existing game law again. After the baiting privilege permit we later got the hog and coyote night hunting permit. But I thought night hunting was dangerous, unfair chase, and needed to be outlawed? Apparently not if you buy a permit.
And don’t even get me started on lifetime license holders needing to keep buying permits, especially the pricy non resident permits if you ever move.